I Made My Best Money Doing Nothing — and Lost It Trying to Be Smart

  The Uncomfortable Truth About Investing

There’s a popular belief that smart people make better investors.
In my experience, that belief is not just wrong — it’s dangerous.

Over the years, I’ve made money in the most boring way possible.
And I’ve also lost money in the most “intelligent,” well-explained, and exciting ways imaginable.

The contrast between those two experiences taught me more about investing than any book, course, or market commentary ever could.

This is not a story about genius or failure.
It’s a story about discipline, ego, and the lies we tell ourselves.

1. The Boring Decision That Actually Worked

In 2020, I started buying gold.

There was no grand strategy.
No complex macro model.
Just a simple observation: massive money printing, rising uncertainty, global instability.

Gold felt… boring.
And that was exactly the point.

I didn’t trade it.
I didn’t watch the price every day.
I didn’t try to time the market.

I just bought it — and held it.

Years later, that decision paid off far more than I expected.
Not because I was particularly smart, but because gold didn’t require intelligence to succeed.

It required patience.

2. The Moment Confidence Turns Into a Trap

Success is dangerous.

After winning quietly with something boring, I started thinking I could do more.
Be smarter.
Be sharper.
Be early.

That’s when I began investing in things that sounded intelligent:

  • complex financial products

  • innovative ideas

  • “next big thing” opportunities

  • assets that came with long explanations and even longer promises

They had great narratives.
They made me feel informed.
They made me feel ahead of the crowd.

They also wiped me out.

3. The Power of a Good Story (and Why It’s So Dangerous)

Bad investments usually don’t look bad at first.
They look exciting.

They come with:

  • visionary founders

  • disruptive technology

  • impressive pitch decks

  • communities that reinforce belief

The story is seductive.
And smart people are especially vulnerable to it.

Why?

Because intelligence helps you rationalize bad decisions.

You don’t ask, “Is this actually making money?”
You ask, “Why will this make money later?”

And there’s always an answer.

4. Ego: The Silent Account Killer

When a bad investment starts going wrong, ego steps in.

Instead of cutting losses, you:

  • wait for the “long term”

  • double down

  • reframe losses as patience

  • blame timing, not judgment

Admitting you’re wrong feels worse than losing money — at least at first.

Over time, that pride becomes expensive.

Some of my worst losses didn’t come from lack of knowledge.
They came from refusing to accept reality.

5. Why Smart People Lose Money Differently

Smart people don’t usually make reckless bets.
They make well-justified mistakes.

They invest in:

  • things that need explanations

  • things that require belief

  • things that only work if the future behaves perfectly

Meanwhile, the best-performing assets in history are often:

  • boring

  • obvious

  • widely understood

  • hated for being “too simple”

Simplicity doesn’t feel intelligent — but it works.

6. Gold Taught Me This One Brutal Lesson

Gold never promised me anything.

No roadmap.
No growth story.
No charismatic spokesperson.

It didn’t need me to believe in it.
It didn’t need me to understand it deeply.

It just existed — and did its job.

The investments that failed me needed constant faith.

That’s the difference.

7. What I Learned the Hard Way

Here are the lessons I paid for:

  • The more exciting an investment sounds, the more careful you should be

  • Intelligence doesn’t protect you from losses — humility does

  • If something requires constant explanation, it’s probably fragile

  • Doing nothing is often harder — and more profitable — than doing something

  • Winning once doesn’t make you immune to being wrong

The best investments don’t make you feel smart.
They make you feel bored.

 Real Investing Is About Restraint

My best financial decisions came from restraint.
My worst ones came from ego.

I didn’t lose money because I was stupid.
I lost money because I wanted to prove I wasn’t.

If there’s one thing I’d tell my younger self, it’s this:

You don’t need to be clever to grow wealth.
You just need to avoid being fooled — especially by yourself.

Comment

Comments

Post a Comment

Viewed in recent months

World University Rankings 2026 Breaks Record with Nearly 2,200 Institutions

 The Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2026 has hit a historic milestone: nearly 2,200 universities are listed this year, the largest number ever, and 2.6 times higher than a decade ago. Global Reach Expands The rankings cover institutions from 115 countries and territories , reflecting a rapid expansion in research capacity and internationalization across higher education. The United States tops the chart with 171 universities , followed by India with 128. Japan, the United Kingdom, and Turkey also secured spots in the top five, each with more than 100 ranked universities. Newcomers this year include Libya, Senegal, and Yemen , each with one institution entering the rankings for the first time. Why This Matters THE noted that the surge demonstrates the growing ambition of universities worldwide to strengthen their research output and global visibility. With competition fiercer than ever, even being included in the list signals progress in internationa...
Read more

Why Schizophrenia Is Called the Most Devastating Mental Illness

 When people hear the word schizophrenia , they often imagine wild stereotypes: “split personalities,” “dangerous behavior,” or “a Hollywood-style madness.” In reality, schizophrenia is far more complex—and far more heartbreaking. Take the story of Henry Cockburn , a 20-year-old British art student. In 2002, he left university on a barefoot walk of more than 100 km, convinced he was being tracked by dark forces. He nearly drowned in icy waters before being rescued, only to begin an 8-year journey through psychiatric hospitals. Doctors diagnosed him with schizophrenia—a condition that doesn’t just disrupt life; it can completely derail it. 👥 Who Does It Affect? Schizophrenia usually appears between ages 15 and 25 —the very years when young people are meant to explore, build careers, and chase dreams. Instead, many face hallucinations, paranoia, and confusion. As Yale professor Deepak D’Souza explains, the disease is “cruel because it strikes before people can fulfill their pot...
Read more

🎂 Japan Hits 100,000 Centenarians… And Runs Out of Kids!

 Japan just smashed another longevity record: nearly 100,000 people over the age of 100 are alive and kicking! If that sounds like a whole city of centenarians—you’re right. Imagine a football stadium packed only with grandmas and grandpas, and you’ve got the picture. pic: AFP 📊 Here’s the breakdown: Total: 99,763 centenarians Women: 87,784 (a whopping 88% 👵✨) Men: 11,979 (rare Pokémon species 🧓) At the top of the leaderboard: 👑 Shigeko Kagawa, 114 – still the reigning queen of birthdays. 👑 Kiyotaka Mizuno, 111 – holding it down for the guys. From 153 to 100,000 🎉 Back in 1963, Japan had just 153 people aged 100+. Today? Multiply that by 650. Clearly, Japan has cracked the “how-to-live-forever” cheat code. The UN even confirms it: Japanese people are more likely to reach 100 than anyone else on Earth. Average life expectancy? 84.5 years . Not bad, huh? So, what’s the secret sauce? 🍣 Doctors say it’s a mix of: ✅ Healthy diet (fish, rice, veg...
Read more

Why Copying Silicon Valley Always Fails?

 Every country wants its own Silicon Valley. They build technology parks. They offer tax incentives. They announce national startup programs. And almost all of them fail. Because Silicon Valley was never a blueprint. It was an accident of history. Silicon Valley didn’t start with startups. It started with war and universities . During World War II and the Cold War, the U.S. government poured massive funding into Stanford and nearby labs for radar, electronics, and defense research. That money created engineers, not entrepreneurs. Companies like HP came first. Startups came later. When people try to copy Silicon Valley, they usually copy the wrong part: the buildings, not the ecosystem. Look at the real ingredients. Silicon Valley works because capital accepts failure . In the U.S., venture capital assumes most startups will die. That’s why Google, Airbnb, and Tesla were allowed to lose money for years. Try copying that in countries where one failure ruins your reputation, a...
Read more

Why Startups Are More Likely to Succeed in Developed Countries?

 People love to believe startups succeed because founders are smarter. But reality is much simpler. Startups succeed more often in developed countries because the system is designed to absorb failure . Take the United States. Google didn’t start as a company. It started as a failed search experiment at Stanford. Amazon lost money for years. Tesla nearly went bankrupt multiple times. In the U.S., bankruptcy laws protect founders, venture capital expects losses, and failure becomes experience—not a life sentence. That single fact changes behavior. When failing doesn’t destroy you, you take real risks. Now look at Israel. Companies like Check Point and Mobileye didn’t come from garages or hype. They came from military units solving real cybersecurity and computer-vision problems under pressure. The Israeli government funded early R&D, private investors took over later, and failed founders recycled into new startups. Failure there is fast—and reusable. Then there’...
Read more

LANGUAGE, POWER, AND THE ILLUSION OF NUMBERS

 People often ask: Which language is spoken the most in the world? The most common answer is Chinese. But that answer hides more than it reveals. What people casually call “Chinese” is not a single language. It is a group of languages—Mandarin, Cantonese, Hokkien, Teochew, Hakka—many of which are not mutually intelligible when spoken . If the same standard were applied in Europe, Spanish, French, and Italian would never be counted as one language. Yet for political and statistical convenience, they are merged into a single massive number. Mandarin appears dominant mostly because of population size, not because of global function. The vast majority of Mandarin speakers are native speakers using it within one cultural and political sphere. Very few people learn Mandarin as a neutral bridge language between different societies. English is different. English is spoken by so many people because it is useful , not because of population. Most English users are not native speakers. E...
Read more

The Right to “Disconnect” After Working Hours

 The boundary between family life and working time has increasingly blurred since remote work became widespread. To protect workers’ rights and well-being, many countries have been considering regulations recognizing the “ right to disconnect ” after working hours. What is the “Right to Disconnect”? What do a Kenyan lawmaker , a restaurant manager in France , and a Portuguese minister have in common? They all support establishing the right of employees to disconnect from work once their working day is over. That means no more weekend emails, late-night messages, or work calls from the boss during family dinner. Experts say the need to disconnect is becoming more urgent as remote and hybrid work models become more common in many companies. When homes turned into workplaces during pandemic lockdowns, Kenyan lawmaker Samson Kiprotich Cherargei noticed that many people were working beyond the legal limit of 52.5 hours per week. As a result, a bill was introduced in Kenya’s parlia...
Read more

Why Humans Walk on Two Legs While Most Mammals Walk on Four

Walking on four legs is the default design for mammals. It’s stable, fast, and mechanically efficient. Yet humans are a rare exception—we walk upright on two legs. This wasn’t a random choice, and it wasn’t because humans were “more intelligent.” The shift to bipedalism is one of the best-documented transitions in evolutionary biology , supported by fossils, anatomy, and biomechanics. 1. Fossil Evidence: When Did Humans Start Walking Upright? One of the strongest pieces of evidence comes from Australopithecus afarensis , a human ancestor that lived about 3.6 million years ago . The Laetoli Footprints (Tanzania) In 1978, scientists discovered fossilized footprints preserved in volcanic ash at Laetoli. What makes them important: Clear heel strike Weight transfer through the foot Toes aligned forward (not grasping like apes) These footprints are indistinguishable from modern human walking , proving upright walking long before large brains evolved. This alone kills t...
Read more

Why Ducks Are One of Nature’s Most Efficient Designs

 At first glance, a duck may seem ordinary. But from a biological and engineering perspective, ducks are one of the most versatile animals on Earth. They can swim, dive, walk, run, and fly - all with the same body. This is not accidental. It is the result of millions of years of natural optimization. A Body Designed for Multiple Environments Most animals are specialized for one primary environment. Fish are built for water. Birds are built for air. Land animals are built for the ground. Ducks are different. They are designed to operate efficiently across air, water, and land . This makes ducks a rare example of a true multi-environment animal. Webbed Feet: More Than Just Swimming Tools A duck’s webbed feet are often associated with swimming, but their function goes far beyond that. When swimming, the webbing spreads wide, pushing against water and generating strong forward thrust. When the foot moves forward, the webbing folds in, reducing resistance. On land, the ...
Read more

Why Schools Teach Knowledge and Skills -Not Character and Ethics

 Modern schools are very good at teaching knowledge and skills . Math. Coding. Engineering. Business strategies. But when it comes to character and ethics , they mostly stay silent. That’s not a mistake. It’s a structural choice. Schools teach what can be standardized . You can test math. You can grade coding. You can certify technical skills. But character? How do you test honesty? How do you score courage? How do you grade responsibility when no one is watching? You can’t. So education systems focus on what’s measurable—and ignore what’s essential. There’s also a deeper reason. Teaching ethics is dangerous. Real ethics requires: Debate Moral disagreement Questioning authority Talking about power, responsibility, and consequences Most systems don’t want that. It’s much safer to teach how to solve problems than when you shouldn’t solve them . That’s why schools produce people who are: Technically competent Highly skilled Emotionally an...
Read more