Why Greenland Belongs to Denmark - and Why the U.S. Wants to Buy It
At first glance, Greenland makes no sense.
It’s geographically part of North America.
It’s closer to Canada than Europe.
Yet politically, it belongs to Denmark, a small country thousands of kilometers away.
This isn’t a mistake.
It’s the result of history, empire, and modern geopolitics.
Why Does Greenland Belong to Denmark?
1. It Started with the Vikings
Greenland was first settled by Norse Vikings around the year 985, led by Erik the Red, a Norse explorer from Iceland.
At the time:
-
Iceland and Greenland were part of the Norse world
-
This world was politically tied to the Kingdom of Norway
So from the beginning, Greenland was connected to Scandinavian rule, not North America.
2. Denmark Inherited Greenland Through a Union
In the late Middle Ages, Denmark and Norway entered a political union known as Denmark–Norway.
When this union dissolved in 1814, a treaty forced Norway to cede:
-
Greenland
-
Iceland
-
The Faroe Islands
to Denmark.
So Denmark didn’t conquer Greenland militarily.
It inherited it legally through European power politics.
3. Colonial Control Turned Into Autonomy
For centuries, Greenland was effectively a Danish colony.
But that changed in the 20th century:
-
1953: Greenland became an integral part of Denmark
-
1979: Home Rule established
-
2009: Self-Government Act
Today:
-
Greenland controls most domestic affairs
-
Denmark handles defense and foreign policy
-
Greenlanders can legally vote for independence in the future
This makes Greenland not a colony, but a self-governing territory within the Danish realm.
So Why Does the United States Want Greenland?
The U.S. interest in Greenland is not new.
America has tried to buy it before:
-
1867 (after buying Alaska)
-
1946 (offered $100 million in gold)
-
2019 (Trump revived the idea)
Why the obsession?
1. Military and Strategic Location
Greenland sits at the crossroads of:
-
North America
-
Europe
-
The Arctic
This makes it critical for:
-
Missile detection
-
Early warning radar
-
Controlling Arctic air and sea routes
The U.S. already operates Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) in Greenland.
As the Arctic ice melts, this location becomes even more valuable.
2. The Arctic Is Opening Up
Climate change is turning the Arctic into a new strategic frontier.
Melting ice means:
-
New shipping routes
-
Easier access to resources
-
Increased military competition
The U.S., Russia, and China all see the Arctic as the next geopolitical chessboard.
Greenland sits right in the middle.
3. Rare Earths and Natural Resources
Greenland has:
-
Rare earth minerals
-
Uranium
-
Oil and gas potential
These resources are crucial for:
-
Electronics
-
Military technology
-
Green energy
The U.S. wants to reduce dependence on China, which currently dominates rare earth supply chains.
Greenland offers an alternative.
4. Blocking Rivals
China has shown interest in:
-
Greenlandic infrastructure
-
Mining projects
-
Arctic research
By strengthening ties or ownership the U.S. limits Chinese influence in a strategically sensitive region.
Why the Purchase Will Never Happen
Here’s the reality:
-
Greenland is not for sale
-
Denmark legally can’t sell it
-
Greenlanders overwhelmingly oppose becoming American
Modern geopolitics doesn’t work like the 19th century anymore.
But the interest itself reveals something important.
What Greenland Really Represents
Greenland isn’t about land.
It’s about:
-
Military positioning
-
Future trade routes
-
Resource security
-
Arctic dominance
Denmark keeps Greenland because of history and law.
The U.S. wants Greenland because of power and the future.
Greenland looks empty and frozen. But in geopolitics, empty spaces are often the most valuable ones.
As the Arctic opens, Greenland is no longer the edge of the world-it’s becoming the center of a new global contest.
Comments
Post a Comment